A- de 2024
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
✓Claimant Sánchez Flórez Ederson·Respondent --
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por extemporáneo
- Requisitos de procedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
La demanda se rechazó porque en el escrito de subsanación persistió el incumplimiento de la carga argumentativa mínima relativa a los requisitos de especificidad, pertinencia y suficiencia.
La Sala Plena de la Corporación constató que el recurso impetrado incumplió el requisito de oportunidad y, por ello, decidió RECHAZARLO.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR, por incumplir el requisito de oportunidad, el recurso de súplica presentado por el ciudadano Ederson Sánchez Flórez en contra del Auto del 16 de octubre de 2024, proferido por el Magistrado Vladimir Fernández Andrade en el expediente D-16.171.
- SEGUNDO. Por medio de la Secretaría General de la Corte,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.